Supreme Court chuan Jharkhand Zirtirtu an hna a pe leh a: Hriattirna Mumal pe lova hremna chuan “Due Process” a Bawhchhia a ti

• Oct 16, 2025
• Admin
• Share

Supreme Court chuan tun hnai khan Jharkhand-a zirtirtute suspend-na chu a ṭhiat a. He thubuai hi Judge pahnih Justices Dipankar Datta leh K.V. Viswanathan khawih niin zirturtu pahnihte chu an chunga original charge a chhan(grounds) tel miahlo in hrem an lo a ni tih an sawi a ni. Court thutlukna hian constitutional principle pawimawh tak a tarlang a — mi tumah hriattirna pek loh leh puhna bik laka inveng theihna hun remchang pek loh chu hremna pek theih an ni lo tih a tarlang a ni. 

 An buai dan: 

He thubuaiah hian zirtirtute pathum chu kum 2015 khan intermediate trained teacher atan ruat an ni a, thla engemaw zat hnuah show-cause notice pek niin hetah hian post-na atana mamawh tlem ber 45% mark an hmuh loh avangin appointment an nei thei lo tiha hrilh an ni a. Zirtirtu te chuan, Scheduled Tribe (ST) category member an nih angin, an tan qualifying na chu 40% a ni a, chu aia tam chu an secure a ni tiin an chhang a.Hetianga hrilhfiahna awm chung hian, employer chuan charge thar leh hriat loh a siam a — candidate-te’n 40% an chhut dan chu an vocational marks chu a vaiin a tel lo a ni tih a sawi a ni. Chutiang marks tel lo chuan, thuneitute chuan an percentage chu 40% hnuai lam a ni dawn niin an hnial a. He puhna hi chhanna pe hman lova siamin zirtirtute pahnih service chu kum 2016 khan tihtawp a ni. 

Zirtirtute chuan Jharkhand High Court hmaah case chu an pu lut a. Single bench chuan an thu chu a pawmpui laiin Division Bench thung erawh chuan an thutlukna chu letling (reverse) sak a ni. 

Supreme Court Argument: 

Appellants (zirtirtu) te chuan original show-cause notice-a tarlan loh chhan-a hrem an nih avangin an hna atanga ban an nih hian natural justice leh due process an bawhchhia niin an sawi a. An hnial dan chuan, notified rule hnuaia mark tling lo chu hlawhtling taka an sawifiah hnuah (ST candidate-te tan 40%) calculation neih dan chungchanga charge danglam, “unstated charge” avanga hrem theih an ni lo tih an sawi tel bawk a ni. 

Respondent-te chuan appellant-te chu vocational marks an paih chhuah chuan norms hman tur hnuaiah an tling lo tih an sawi a. 

Supreme Court Thutlukna: 

Supreme Court  chuan zirtirtu te chu an tlin lohna(ineligibility) thar chhanna tur hun remchang an neih loh avangin (vocational marks tel lo atanga chhut) an service ṭ ṭhiahna order chhuah chu dan angin a tling lo tih a sawi a. 

Court chuan zirtirtute chu an post-ah a dah leh a, an service chu December 2015-a an ruat hmasak ber atanga chhunzawm chho zel anga ngaih an nih tur thu a puang a. Chu bakah chuan hlawh leh seniority hlawkpuina kimchang tak an dawng thei a. Amaherawhchu ,an zirtir loh hun chhung chu promotion tan experience-ah a chhiar tel dawn lo tih a sawi tel a ni.  

(He case Civil Appeal No. 11748,11749 leh 11750 OF 2025 ah hian Appellant tan hian  Mr. Binod Singh, Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Singh, AOR an ding a. Respondent tan Mr. Syed Uruj Abbas, A.A.G. Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Adv. Mr. Shantanu Sagar, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Gunjesh Ranjan, Adv. Mr. Niket Nalin, Adv. Mr. Manoneet Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr. Jayesh Gaurav, Adv. Ms. Diksha Ojha, Adv. Mr. Ishwar Chandra Roy, Adv. Mr. Farrukh Rasheed, AOR an ding a ni). 

       -JC Lalnunsanga(AoR, Supreme Court)